Balance Between Manual QA and QA Automation
Human mistakes are unavoidable, and bugs will be missed. And automatic tests can't effectively cover 100% of the code. But both approaches ideally complement each other. Manual QA can react faster to test new features. They prevent developers from delivering broken functionality. When they do make mistakes, our developers-in-test fill the gaps without affecting the project's initial estimation. And the rest of the time, developers-in-test automate regression testing routines.